Louise Woodward Index
Straight from the LondonNet newsdesk
From our archive: Life sentence, D-Day for Louise
Judgement delivered on
WWW: Ruling delivered live on the net
The likely defence submissions
Louise Woodward Campaign:
Guilty or Not
Guilty?: You have your say
Other sites covering the trial
Check our LondonNet
News Headlines for the latest. Bookmark this page for your
in depth guide
by P.D.Clee, LondonNet Publisher
Two hundred years ago French philosopher Voltaire enlightened
us with the principle that it is far better to risk acquitting
a guilty man than to ever chance convicting an innocent man.
Throughout Louise Woodward's trial and appeal we have striven
to keep an open mind as to the au pair's guilt or innocence.
While other members of the press first condemned her and then
rushed to condemn the US legal system, we have always held true
to the principle that judgement can only occur by one's peers
at the end of a full and fair trial. True judgement is not the
preserve of the media but of judge and jury.
We did have serious doubts about the conduct of the trial,
however. Our criticisms of Judge Zobel centred around his inability
to reign in an over-zealous and prejudiced prosecution who appeared
to fail in their ultimate duty as "officers of the court"
to ensure Louise had a fair trial. When prosecutions go off the
rails we all lose. Again this is no preserve of the US system,
remember the Birmingham Six, the Guildford Four and the Bridgewater
The latest developments surrounding claims that one of Louise's
defence team believes she is guilty shows just how far this farce
has gone. As a defence trial lawyer the most common question
you are asked is "what if you think your client is guilty?".
Who cares. That is not your job, rather you must focus your attention
on representing your client's case to the best of your abilities.
Elaine Whitfield-Sharp's admissions first to a traffic-cop
then to a friend in a taped call, if true, surely finally rule
out any chance that Louise can be dealt with fairly in this mess.
First her trial was tainted, now her appeal will be decided under
a cloud of gossip and second-guessing.
So no one will ever the know the real truth by any fair measure
of justice. Baby Matthew Eappen is dead. Rightly or wrongly the
name Louise Woodward will always be associated with his death.
However a safe conviction can only occur after a fair trial and
where there is no reasonable doubt. Neither test has ever been
nor indeed can ever be met.
Register with LondonNet now!
Start receiving your free newsletter packed full of the latest
info on London direct from the LondonNet team